Strategic Islam? The Gülen Network, Sibel Edmonds, and the West's Hidden Hand
Introduction: When Conspiracy Becomes Strategy For decades, any suggestion that the West—especially the United States—would sponsor Islamic networks has been derided as fringe conspiracy theory. Yet mounting testimony, whistleblower evidence, and geopolitical patterns point to a troubling question: What if the West has deliberately supported certain Islamic movements for strategic gain? One of the most striking examples of this possibility lies in the curious rise of Fethullah Gülen—a once obscure Turkish cleric whose multibillion-dollar religious-educational empire spans continents.
Former FBI translator and whistleblower Sibel Edmonds has been one of the few voices publicly connecting the dots. Her firsthand knowledge of operations in Central Asia, her testimony about diplomatic misuse, and her persistent warnings about Gülen's movement offer a rare glimpse behind the curtain of covert statecraft.
1. The Enigma of Fethullah Gülen Fethullah Gülen was a relatively unknown preacher from Turkey who moved to the United States in 1999, ostensibly for medical treatment. From modest beginnings, he built an educational and religious movement known as Hizmet, which now claims millions of followers, operates hundreds of schools, and has access to vast financial resources.
Estimated assets: $20 billion globally. Reach: Over 350 mosques, madrassas, and charter schools—particularly in Central Asia, the Balkans, the Middle East, and the United States.
This rapid rise prompts a fundamental question: How does a financially struggling preacher amass this kind of global influence in less than a decade—particularly in strategically sensitive regions of the post-Soviet world?
2. The Diplomatic Passport Anomaly Sibel Edmonds, while working as an FBI translator, uncovered internal documentation suggesting that teachers associated with Gülen’s schools were traveling under U.S.-issued diplomatic passports.
"These are English teachers going to Kazakhstan and Uzbekistan—not ambassadors. Why are they traveling under diplomatic protection?" — Sibel Edmonds
Under U.S. law and diplomatic norms, diplomatic passports are issued strictly for official government employees conducting official business. The use of such credentials by private religious educators is not only irregular—it strongly suggests government sponsorship or intelligence cover.
Edmonds contends that this arrangement was not accidental, but part of a covert influence operation designed to install Western-friendly ideological networks in former Soviet Muslim republics.
3. Gülen's Strategic Utility in Central Asia Central Asia represents a critical geopolitical flashpoint. Following the collapse of the USSR, these newly independent, largely Muslim nations became a contested zone of influence between Russia, China, and the West.
Through the Gülen network:
Western-aligned educational institutions were rapidly implanted.
Youth were exposed to moderate Islamic teachings mixed with Western civic ideals.
Local elites were cultivated via scholarships and soft-power outreach.
This is consistent with CIA historical precedent—using religious and cultural institutions as instruments of soft penetration:
Mujahideen in Afghanistan (1980s)
Operation Gladio (Europe, post-WWII)
Ties to Muslim Brotherhood offshoots in Egypt and Syria
In this context, Gülen’s rise was not an anomaly—it was a feature of Western strategy.
4. Sibel Edmonds: Gagged but Not Silenced Sibel Edmonds’ credibility is not in question:
She worked as an FBI translator post-9/11.
She raised concerns about espionage, bribery, and infiltration involving high-level officials.
The U.S. government placed a state secrets gag order on her—one of the rarest and most extreme legal tools available.
The DOJ Inspector General later found her allegations credible.
She has testified that:
U.S. agencies shielded radical or “useful” Islamic networks.
The Gülen movement had deep ties to elements of U.S. intelligence.
Money laundering and trafficking were occurring through NGOs connected to these operations.
5. Turkey's Reaction and the Coup Connection In 2016, Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan accused Fethullah Gülen of orchestrating a failed military coup. Turkey declared the Gülen movement a terrorist organization (FETÖ) and demanded Gülen’s extradition.
The U.S. government refused.
This refusal, along with the protective bubble surrounding Gülen’s compound in Pennsylvania, only reinforced suspicions that he was more than just a religious leader—he was an asset.
6. The Bigger Picture: Islam as a Strategic Tool The question is not whether the West opposes radical Islam—but rather which forms of Islam it uses as levers of control.
By sponsoring “moderate” networks:
The U.S. gains influence in Muslim-majority regions without direct military presence.
It shapes elite educational channels and future leadership classes.
It contains potential rival ideologies, like nationalism or pan-Eurasianism.
This is not conspiracy theory—it’s geostrategy.
Conclusion: Unmasking the Hidden Hand The case of Fethullah Gülen—and the whistleblowing of Sibel Edmonds—reveals a pattern of state behavior that hides behind NGOs, religious networks, and educational fronts.
The Western support for selected Islamic movements is not about theology—it’s about influence, destabilization, and silent war. What the public sees as religious outreach, the intelligence community often sees as a delivery system for ideology, recruitment, and control.
The question we should be asking is not whether this happened—but how much of what we call "spontaneous religious movements" are in fact designed operations? And if so, who is behind the curtain, and to what end?
Sources for Further Review (suggested for article citation):
Sibel Edmonds, Classified Woman: The Sibel Edmonds Story
The American Conservative, “Sibel Edmonds’ Secret”
Judicial Watch, FOIA on Gülen’s visa and movement
Wikileaks: US State Department cables referencing Gülen schools
Michael Rubin, AEI: "The Rise and Fall of Fethullah Gülen"
Turkish government indictment: FETÖ and the 2016 coup
No comments:
Post a Comment