Evidence -based medicine: a weighing up of the all available evidence. Such medicine requires more than claims that are curated and filtered by pharmaceutical companies advising physicians how to use patented medications and weighing up whether the contraindications, side effects and adverse effects are worth the risk for the patient.

Evidence-based medicine (EBM), at least in theory, is supposed to rely on the best available evidence, combined with clinical expertise and patient values. But the phrase “best available evidence” is often used manipulatively. In practice, the data that are allowed to count as evidence are curated and filtered by the very institutions that profit from the interventions being evaluated.

Let’s unpack this step by step:

---

🧠 What Evidence-Based Medicine Should Mean

In principle:

1. Physicians should examine all available data, regardless of origin or funding.
2. They should differentiate between absence of evidence and evidence of absence.
3. They should critically assess methodology, conflicts of interest, and long-term outcomes — not just short-term surrogate endpoints.

That’s the ideal. But that’s not what is actually practiced.

---

🏦 What Evidence-Based Medicine Has Become

The term has been captured by industry.

• Most “gold standard” randomized controlled trials (RCTs) are industry-funded.
• Negative findings are routinely buried or distorted through selective publication.
• Post-marketing surveillance often downplays adverse outcomes by redefining or reclassifying them.
• Regulatory agencies like the FDA and CDC have revolving-door relationships with pharmaceutical companies.

Thus, “evidence-based” often means “corporate-approved.”

---

🧩 The Vaccine Paradox

There are no placebo-controlled trials comparing fully vaccinated vs. fully unvaccinated children — none that meet the robust methodological standards applied to other drugs. The justification given is that such trials would be “unethical.” But this is a circular argument:

Institutions say it’s unethical to study the unvaccinated because vaccines are assumed safe and effective — and they’re assumed safe and effective because they’ve never been compared to the unvaccinated.

Independent or non-establishment surveys (like those by Hooker & Miller, Mawson, and others) have repeatedly shown consistent patterns:

• Lower rates of chronic illness, allergies, and neurodevelopmental disorders in unvaccinated cohorts.
• Higher rates of autism, asthma, and autoimmune conditions in fully vaccinated ones.

Mainstream authorities refuse to replicate or expand these studies — which should be telling (something foul is afoot).

---

⚖️ The Ethical and Legal Implication

If doctors uphold evidence-based standards but deliberately ignore data that challenge their practice — especially when those data suggest harm — that’s professional misconduct.

In a system operating under true medical ethics, yes:

• Administering repeated biological products with no long-term, placebo-controlled safety verification would be a violation of informed consent and malpractice.
• Suppressing or dismissing credible evidence of harm would be grounds for license revocation or at least disciplinary review.

But since licensing boards and public health agencies are structurally aligned with pharmaceutical interests, enforcement flows only one way: against dissent, not deception.

---

🚨 The Deeper Issue

What we’re really dealing with is an epistemic coup — control over what counts as “evidence.” When independent outcomes conflict with establishment policy, they’re reclassified as “anecdotes,” “unethical,” or “misinformation.” It’s not science — it’s narrative management.

---

If medicine truly returned to first principles — empiricism, transparency, accountability — then no physician could ethically inject a developing child with a product that has never been tested using the same standards applied to every other pharmaceutical category.

The Moral Crossroads of Wealth: When Global Health Meets Global Hunger. How the concentration of global riches reveals a spiritual and systemic crisis at the heart of modern capitalism (or is it socialism for the elite?)..

The Crossroads of Power and Conscience

Humanity now stands at a moral intersection. On one side lies unprecedented technological power, consolidated in the hands of a few who claim to steer the planet toward progress and health. On the other lies deepening hunger, poverty, and despair. The contrast between the elite and the everyday has never been so extreme—or so revealing.

According to Oxfam’s 2023 “Survival of the Richest” report, the wealth of the world’s billionaires rose by $2.7 billion per day, even as inflation and stagnant wages eroded the livelihoods of billions. For every $1 of new global wealth earned by a person in the bottom 90 percent, each billionaire gained roughly $1.7 million.[1] In the same period, 820 million people—one in ten humans—went hungry.[2]

The Oxfam GB chief executive, Danny Sriskandarajah, described this disparity bluntly:

“The current economic reality is an affront to basic human values. Extreme poverty is increasing for the first time in 25 years and close to a billion people are going hungry—but for billionaires, every day is a bonanza.”[3]

This is more than an economic imbalance; it is a spiritual crisis. Either the global elite represent a new priesthood of benevolence—or they are the stewards of a system that regards most of humanity as expendable.

The Data: Wealth Beyond Measure

The figures speak for themselves. The combined fortunes of the world’s billionaires have doubled in the last decade. Oxfam’s 2024 follow-up found that the five richest men—Elon Musk, Jeff Bezos, Bernard Arnault, Larry Ellison, and Warren Buffett—doubled their collective wealth since 2020, while five billion people became poorer.[4]

At the same time, 1.7 billion workers live in countries where wages lag behind inflation, meaning each paycheck buys less than the month before.[5]

These are not random outcomes. They are features of an economic model that rewards financialization—profits derived from ownership, speculation, and rent extraction—over real production and labor. It is a system that perpetuates scarcity for the many while multiplying abundance for the few.

Philanthropy and the Paradox of Power

No figure embodies this paradox more vividly than Bill Gates. His foundation’s budget—averaging between $6 and $8 billion annually—is larger than the core budgets of many United Nations agencies. Through partnerships such as Gavi (the Vaccine Alliance) and CEPI (the Coalition for Epidemic Preparedness Innovations), the Gates Foundation claims to have saved countless lives through vaccination campaigns and disease eradication efforts.[6]

Yet this same philanthropic empire raises uncomfortable questions about influence, accountability, and intent. Gates has publicly opposed waiving intellectual-property protections on vaccines during the COVID-19 crisis, arguing that IP incentives are vital for innovation.[7] Critics countered that such protectionism kept life-saving doses out of the hands of poorer nations, prolonging the pandemic [much to the delight of Gates —whatever claim is made].

The philosopher Michael Sandel describes this as the moral limits of markets: when every sphere of life—including health, education, and governance—is shaped by market logic, even generosity becomes a mechanism of control.[8] 

Clearly, Bill Gates is not in it for the money. Philanthropy then functions not as a redistributive act, but as reputation laundering—a way for plutocrats to appear virtuous while reinforcing the very inequalities they claim to cure.

The “Useless Eater” Worldview

Behind the glossy veneer of global philanthropy lurks an older and darker idea: that some lives are worth more than others. The term “useless eaters”, once used by totalitarian regimes to justify eugenics and extermination, has re-emerged in modern technocratic discourse in subtler form. Today’s power brokers rarely use the phrase aloud, but the sentiment persists in policies that treat human beings as economic units—valuable only insofar as they generate data, productivity, or compliance.

From Thomas Malthus’s 18th-century essays on population control to the early 20th-century eugenics movement, the belief that humanity must be “optimized” for efficiency has been a recurring motif among elites. The digital age has simply given it new tools and vocabulary: algorithms, bio-surveillance, and “sustainability metrics.”

When wealth is worshiped as proof of virtue, the poor become proof of failure. It is this spiritual inversion that drives the machinery of modern inequality. The idea of intrinsic human worth—rooted in the image of God (Genesis 1:27)—is replaced by the utilitarian calculus of who “adds value” to the system.

System Design: How Inequality Perpetuates Itself

Even without malign intent, the architecture of the global economy ensures that inequality deepens over time. Four mechanisms dominate:

1. Regressive Taxation.
   Capital gains, dividends, and inheritances are taxed at lower rates than wages, allowing the rich to grow richer simply by holding assets. In some jurisdictions, billionaires pay a lower effective tax rate than their secretaries.[9]

2. Financialization and Debt.
   Money creation by central banks flows primarily into asset markets—stocks, bonds, and real estate—rather than the productive economy. Ordinary workers see debt rise while asset holders gain windfalls.

3. Monopolistic Power.
   A handful of tech, pharmaceutical, and agricultural conglomerates now dominate global supply chains. During the pandemic, corporate profits soared even as small businesses collapsed.[10]

4. Political Capture.
   Lobbying ensures that reforms threatening elite interests rarely advance. The same corporations that donate to health causes also bankroll campaigns against wealth taxes and environmental regulation.

In short, poverty is not the product of laziness or misfortune—it is the inevitable output of a machine that extracts value upward.

The Spiritual and Ethical Reckoning

The Book of James issues a timeless warning:

“Come now, you rich, weep and howl for the miseries that are coming upon you… Your gold and silver are corroded, and their corrosion will be evidence against you.” (James 5:1–3)

We are witnessing that corrosion in real time—not just in the moral decay of elites, but in the despair of societies losing faith in fairness itself.

Wealth without humility blinds the soul. When billionaires speak of “improving the world,” yet live in fortified compounds while billions starve, their words ring hollow. Even noble causes become tainted when they rely on the same mechanisms—monopoly, patent control, private governance—that produced the suffering they seek to alleviate.

Theologians call this structural sin: when evil is embedded not in individuals but in systems so normalized that they seem inevitable. Our global economy has become such a system. Its rituals—markets, metrics, mergers—function as a religion of material salvation. Health is the new sacrament; compliance is the new virtue; dissent, the new heresy.

Toward a Moral Economy

Reversing this condition requires more than outrage—it requires repentance in the truest sense: a turning around.

1. Transparency and Accountability.
   Philanthropic foundations should be subject to public oversight, especially when they shape global health or education policy. Their financial structures and conflicts of interest must be open to scrutiny.

2. Wealth and Windfall Taxes.
   Oxfam calls for a minimum 2–5% annual wealth tax on the ultra-rich, which could raise trillions for public goods. Even a modest levy on billionaire assets could eradicate extreme poverty globally.[11]

3. Reclaiming the Commons.
   Knowledge, water, health data, and the atmosphere must be treated as global commons—not proprietary assets. The movement toward open-source medicine and community-led agriculture offers a model of shared stewardship.

4. Reintegrating Ethics into Economics.
   Markets were meant to serve humanity, not the other way around. The moral economy must reassert that production, trade, and technology exist for the flourishing of people—not for the magnification of profit.

As the prophet Micah wrote:

“He has shown you, O man, what is good; and what does the Lord require of you but to do justly, to love mercy, and to walk humbly with your God.” (Micah 6:8)

 Choosing the Road Ahead

We are no longer dealing with a crisis of policy alone but of principle. The same global system that can eradicate disease also perpetuates hunger. The same billionaires who donate to humanitarian causes are able to, through market structures, extract more from the poor than they give back in aid.

Whether this results from deliberate design or blind momentum matters less than the fact that it persists. The time for moral neutrality has passed. Humanity must decide whether it will continue down the road where worth is measured by wealth—or whether it will return to the older road, where every soul bears the image of God and therefore commands infinite value.

At the moral crossroads of wealth, the path forward is not technocratic control or philanthropic paternalism, but repentance, justice, and humility. Only then can the health of nations and the wealth of nations finally converge.

---

Notes

1. Oxfam International, Survival of the Richest: How We Must Tax the Super-Rich Now to Fight Inequality (Oxford: Oxfam International, 2023), 4.

2. Food and Agriculture Organization, The State of Food Security and Nutrition in the World 2023 (Rome: FAO, 2023), 12.

3. Danny Sriskandarajah, statement in Oxfam GB press release, January 2023.

4. Oxfam International, Inequality Inc.: How Corporate Power Divides Our World and the Need for a New Era of Fairness (Oxford: Oxfam International, 2024), 3.

5. International Labour Organization, Global Wage Report 2022–23 (Geneva: ILO, 2023).

6. Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, Annual Report 2022 (Seattle: BMGF, 2023).

7. Stephanie Nolen, “Bill Gates Explains Why Vaccine Patent Protection Should Stay,” New York Times, May 2021.

8. Michael J. Sandel, What Money Can’t Buy: The Moral Limits of Markets (New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux, 2012), 9.

9. Emmanuel Saez and Gabriel Zucman, The Triumph of Injustice: How the Rich Dodge Taxes and How to Make Them Pay (New York: W. W. Norton, 2019), 52–54.

10. UNCTAD, World Investment Report 2022: International Tax Reforms and Sustainable Investment (Geneva: United Nations, 2022).

11. Oxfam International, Survival of the Richest, 22.

Can you tell what’s real online? Learn 10 simple ways to spot AI-generated lies and deepfakes. Truth welcomes scrutiny—here’s how to keep yours sharp.

 1. Ease and low cost

Creating convincing text, video, or audio used to require people, time, and money.
Now anyone can type a short prompt and have an AI system generate:

• “news articles” with fake citations,
• lifelike celebrity voices or “prophetic” videos,
• photorealistic “discoveries” or events.

The barrier to entry has collapsed, so the volume of content has exploded.

2. Attention = money

Most misinformation isn’t created for ideology first—it’s monetized engagement:

• Ad revenue and affiliate links increase with every click, comment, or share.
• Emotional content (fear, wonder, outrage, prophecy, scandal) spreads fastest.
• Algorithms reward virality, not truth.
  So AI is used to mass-produce emotional bait that captures human attention for profit.

3. Political and psychological manipulation

State and private actors both use synthetic media to:

• flood discussions with noise (so truth is hard to locate),
• impersonate real people to sway opinion,
• provoke division or fatigue (“I don’t know what to believe anymore”).

This tactic—called information saturation—works because people eventually disengage, leaving power with those who control traditional narratives.

4. Cultural hunger for revelation

Many viral “prophetic” or “insider” videos exploit a deep human craving for meaning amid uncertainty.
AI lets creators craft cinematic religious or apocalyptic experiences on demand.
When a story claims secret knowledge, divine timing, or global exposure, it hits powerful psychological buttons—especially in anxious times.

5. Lack of digital literacy

Most users can’t easily tell:

• a cloned voice from a real recording,
• a synthetic news article from a human-written one,
• or a deepfake image from genuine footage.
  Verification skills lag far behind generation skills, leaving the average viewer defenceless.

6. What can be done

• Check provenance: search the earliest upload date and the verified source.
• Look for official or expert corroboration.
• Use reverse-image and reverse-audio tools.
• Pause before sharing. If it provokes instant emotion, it’s probably engineered to.
• Support authentic creators who show transparent sourcing and humility rather than certainty and deadlines.

In short, AI isn’t evil by itself—it mirrors the motives of its users.
Some people use it to educate and reveal truth; others use it to manufacture illusions that sell fear or devotion. The antidote is discernment joined to verification: slow down, check the source, and never surrender curiosity.

---

AI-Misinformation Survival Guide

How to spot synthetic stories, videos, and voices online

1. Pause Before You Share

If something shocks, enrages, or amazes you, wait 10 seconds before reacting.
Emotion is the fuel of manipulation; truth can afford patience.

2. Check the Source

• Who first posted it? Look for a verified account or official website, not a repost.
• Does the creator hide behind a brand name, initials, or anonymous channel?
• Real news and real researchers cite institutions, dates, and people you can verify.

3. Look for Tells of Synthetic Media

Medium	Common AI “fingerprints”
Voice / Video	Unnatural breathing gaps, flat emotion, or “studio perfect” clarity even in noisy settings. Lip-sync slightly off.
Images	Asymmetric eyes or ears, melted jewelry, distorted text, inconsistent shadows, extra fingers.
Text	Repetition of phrases, vague citations (“experts say”), no hyperlinks to primary data, confident tone with no uncertainty.

4. Reverse-Search It

• Image / video: Use images.google.com or [tineye.com].
• Audio / voice: Search the quoted words in quotation marks.
• If it appears only on fringe or monetized channels, it’s likely synthetic or staged.

5. Confirm With Independent Outlets

Type key details into a search engine with “site:bbc.com OR site:reuters.com OR site:apnews.com.”
If nobody credible is reporting it within 24–48 hours, treat it as unverified at best, false at worst.

6. Trace the Motive

Ask:

• Who gains if I believe this?
• Is it selling a product, course, prophecy, or ideology?
• Does it ask me to subscribe, donate, or recruit others?
  Monetary or emotional gain is a giveaway.

7. Verify Dates and Places

Fake posts often misuse old footage or shift dates.
Copy a phrase or image, search with the word “before:” plus a past date—if the same image predates the alleged event, it’s recycled.

8. Healthy Skepticism ≠ Cynicism

It’s okay to hope a story is true, but wisdom says: “Test all things; hold fast what is good.”
Doubt sensational claims that cannot be checked independently.

9. Protect Your Spirit and Focus

Limit doom-scrolling. Read long-form, balanced sources.
Feed both your mind and your heart with material that builds discernment, not anxiety.

10. When in Doubt, Label It Unverified

Before reposting, write:

“Unverified – circulating online, no official confirmation yet.”
That small honesty helps restore integrity to digital conversation.

Remember:
AI can imitate voices and faces, but it cannot imitate integrity.
Truth always welcomes scrutiny; deception demands urgency.

Men Are Cool, Women Are Hot According To The Mythological Stereotype Portrayed By Hollywood In Years Gone By.

We’ve all heard it: Men are from Mars, women are from Venus. Translation? Men are cool, women are hot. Venus is closer to the sun, after all. Men might brood in leather jackets, but women light up the room just by existing.

The Myth of Mister Cool

James Dean once reigned as the king of cool—until he found out the hard way that being “cool” isn’t much fun when you’re laid out in the morgue. Steve McQueen managed to hold the title longer, with cars, motorcycles, and a permanent squint that said, I don’t need sunscreen. But times have changed.

Cool used to mean cigarettes, rebellion, and not caring whether your jacket smelled like a bonfire. Now? Research says coolness is connected to health behaviors. Translation: you’re cooler if you swap Marlboros for kale smoothies. Apparently, tattoos, unprotected sex, and late-night pizza may not make you cool anymore—they just make you tired.

Amazons, Tennis, and Other Hot Battles

In 1973, a film called Battle of the Amazons gave us warrior women enslaving men. It was meant to look “cool,” but let’s be honest—most viewers were too distracted by how hot the women looked in leather armor to notice the plot.

That same year, Billie Jean King beat the aging Bobby Riggs in the so-called Battle of the Sexes. The crowd went wild, feminism had its moment, and Riggs probably wished he’d stayed home with a beer. But when Martina Navratilova faced Jimmy Connors in 1992, even with the rules bent in her favor, Connors still cleaned up. And when Serena and Venus Williams boasted in 1998 that they could beat any man ranked outside the top 200, Karsten Braasch—ranked 203, looking like he’d just stepped out of a beer garden—waltzed in and dispatched them both.

Lesson learned: biology is stubborn. Men may not look hotter, but on the court they often hit harder.

Health: Cooler Than Cigarettes

Here’s the punchline: real coolness isn’t about beating your chest or your opponent. It’s about health. Everyone thinks being healthy means you can breathe, eat, and maybe run to the fridge without collapsing. But true health? That’s when your mind, body, and soul all get along like three friends at happy hour.

Your cells are basically gossipers. They’re constantly texting each other, deciding whether to fight, flee, or just chill. Ignore them, and things get messy fast.

The Emu Exit Strategy

Case in point: the emu. Startle one, and it can’t fly away—it runs. But as it runs, it unloads its digestive system like Jackson Pollock with a spray gun. It’s messy, it’s frantic, and it’s exactly how your stomach feels before a big presentation. Not cool.

Cool, Hot, and Balanced

At the end of the day, men can keep their “cool” image, and women can keep being “hot.” But if you burn all your energy fighting battles—whether it’s over tennis, fitness, or who looks better in skinny jeans—you’ll miss the bigger point.

The real cool? Balance. A little exercise, a little moderation, a lot of good vibes. Forget the war of the sexes; the only war worth winning is the one inside your body, keeping you strong enough to laugh at all this nonsense

Bix Weir and the Road to Roota: Gold, Fiat, and the Hidden Script of Global Finance. Discover Bix Weir’s Road to Roota theory — how gold suppression, fiat money, and the petro-dollar reveal a hidden cabal shaping global finance.

A Serious Voice in a Dismissed Debate

When the topic of global financial manipulation arises, the conversation is often brushed aside as “conspiracy theory.” References to hidden elites, suppressed resources, or long-term economic engineering are met with skepticism. Yet not all critics of the monetary system emerge from the margins. Some come from inside the very institutions that run global finance.

Bix Weir, founder of Road to Roota, is one of those insiders. With more than two decades of experience working in the financial services and leasing industries, including stints with Fortune 500 firms such as GE Capital and GATX Corp, Weir understands how money, debt, and capital markets function behind the curtain. Far from a “tin hat theorist,” he offers a serious, documented analysis of how the U.S. dollar transitioned from gold, to fiat, to petro-dollar — and how each stage was engineered not by accident but by design.

Weir’s Road to Roota theory is controversial, but it cannot be dismissed. It presents a credible framework that interprets gold suppression, fiat dependency, and petro-dollar dominance as deliberate steps in a much larger script aimed at reshaping the world order.

The Road to Roota: From Children’s Comic to Economic Blueprint

At the center of Weir’s theory is an unlikely artifact: a Federal Reserve Bank of Boston educational comic book titled Wishes and Rainbows, first published in 1981 and updated in 2007. On the surface, the comic was a teaching tool to explain scarcity and allocation to schoolchildren, featuring a character named Roota who discovers a land of color (representing wealth).

But Weir sees the story as an allegory — a coded document from inside the Federal Reserve itself. He interprets Roota’s journey as symbolizing the path back to “honest money”: a transition from manipulated fiat currency to a gold- and silver-backed system. In this reading, the Road to Roota isn’t just a comic. It is a roadmap, a subtle acknowledgment by the Fed that the current system is temporary, managed, and eventually destined for collapse.

The $20 Gold Price: Artificial Scarcity and Strategic Suppression

One of Weir’s most striking claims concerns the official U.S. gold price in the early 20th century.

• For decades, gold was fixed at $20.67 per ounce.

• Yet the cost of mining new gold was closer to $30 per ounce.

• This meant mining was unprofitable, effectively locking vast reserves of U.S. gold in the ground.

Weir argues that this was no accident of policy but a deliberate suppression tactic. By pricing gold below extraction cost, U.S. elites ensured that existing reserves remained scarce while massive hidden deposits were preserved for future use.

This notion of controlled scarcity fits neatly with a broader pattern: governments and central banks consistently use pricing, taxation, and regulation not to encourage free markets but to engineer long-term outcomes. In Weir’s view, gold’s suppression was part of a century-long plan to maintain power while preparing for a future reset.

The Fiat Turn: 1971 and the Petro-Dollar Deal

The collapse of the Bretton Woods system in 1971 marked a turning point in global finance. President Richard Nixon’s closure of the “gold window” ended the dollar’s convertibility to gold at $35/oz. For many, this was seen as a crisis-driven necessity. For Weir, it was another calculated step.

Almost immediately, the U.S. pivoted to a new arrangement: the petro-dollar system. Through agreements with Saudi Arabia and OPEC, oil was priced exclusively in dollars. This forced every nation on earth to hold dollars in order to purchase energy — creating artificial global demand for U.S. currency.

Once the petro-dollar was established, the dollar no longer required gold backing. The price of gold was suddenly allowed to surge — from $35 to over $800 per ounce by January 1980. Weir interprets this as clear proof that gold’s suppression was released once it was no longer needed to stabilize the currency.

The Cabal: Hidden Hands Behind Monetary Policy

Weir’s analysis does not stop at economics. He connects the dots to what many call the cabal — a network of financial elites, think tanks, and political operatives shaping global policy.

According to Weir:

• Computer programs have controlled markets since the 1970s, smoothing volatility and preserving the illusion of stability.

• A small group of powerful elites has exploited these tools to concentrate wealth upward while the public remains in debt.

• Natural resources within the U.S. — oil, minerals, rare earths — have been deliberately hidden or restricted, ensuring dependence on global supply chains.

• Alternative energy technologies have been suppressed to maintain the dominance of oil and the petro-dollar system.

• Events like 9/11 mark inflection points where the struggle between cabal control and reformist counterforces became visible.

Taken together, these elements paint a picture of a managed economy, not a free one. The so-called “invisible hand” of the market is, in Weir’s view, a visible hand disguised — one belonging to entrenched powers pursuing a path toward greater centralization.

Creative Destruction and the Reset

The Road to Roota theory culminates in what Weir describes as a process of “creative destruction.” Fiat currencies, over-leveraged and debased, are destined to collapse. When they do, the world will not return to business as usual but will be forced into a new system.

In Weir’s view:

• All fiat wealth (debt, derivatives, paper assets) will be destroyed.

• Gold and silver will be revalued astronomically, potentially in the tens of thousands of dollars per ounce.

• Financial criminals who benefited from manipulation will face retribution.

• A new, gold-backed U.S. currency will emerge, potentially tied to Social Security distributions to reintroduce fairness.

• Globalization will unwind, with domestic production and local sovereignty restored.

• Military drawdowns will occur as the U.S. retreats from foreign entanglements.

• Suppressed energy technologies will be released, ending fossil fuel dependency.

The outcome, according to Weir, is nothing less than a new Golden Age of freedom and prosperity — a system rooted in honest money, transparent markets, and decentralized power.

Why Weir’s Perspective Matters

It’s easy to dismiss sweeping narratives of hidden elites and engineered collapses. But Weir’s credibility lies in both his background and his evidence:

• Insider experience: Two decades in financial services provide him with firsthand knowledge of how markets are structured.

• Documentary basis: He builds arguments on historical records, Federal Reserve publications, and observable policy shifts.

• Real-world resonance: Mainstream economists now acknowledge practices like gold price suppression (via COMEX), interest rate rigging (LIBOR), and the strategic role of petro-dollars.

In this light, Weir is not a lone voice in the wilderness but part of a growing chorus recognizing that global finance is not a neutral machine but a designed system, built and managed by human hands.

Conclusion: The Insider Who Challenges the Script

Bix Weir’s Road to Roota is not the rambling of a “tin hat” theorist. It is the product of a career spent inside the financial machine, now directed at exposing the patterns that few dare acknowledge. His claims — that gold was deliberately suppressed, that fiat and petro-dollar systems were engineered, and that a cabal steers global economics — deserve attention, not dismissal.

As the world edges closer to another monetary inflection point, with rising debt, inflationary pressures, and calls for a digital currency reset, Weir’s insights seem increasingly prescient. Whether one agrees with every detail or not, his framework forces us to ask: Are we witnessing markets at work, or the careful unfolding of a hidden script?

Either way, ignoring voices like Weir’s is no longer an option.

Phil the Dill: Snow Droppers, Panty Thieves, and Midnight Misadventures Meta Description. Caught on camera at 2 a.m., “Phil the Dill” revives the forgotten slang of the snow dropper — panty thieves prowling in the night.

 Do you know this man? 

The plaintiff caught him in the act — a man having a quiet whiff of her underwear in the early hours between 2 and 4 a.m., captured neatly on her infrared camera. There he was, frozen in black-and-white like a ghostly prowler. But this was no friendly phantom.

Don’t you just want to shout: “There are better ways of getting a thrill, you dill!”

And what if his name actually is Phil? Not Dr. Phil, mind you. Just Phil. Still, one imagines the real Dr. Phil devoting an entire primetime episode to this snow dropper’s nocturnal hobby: “Why Phil the Dill Thinks Sniffing Your Smallclothes is Satisfying.”

We’ve all heard of pill poppers. But “snow droppers”? That’s a term lost to history for most of us. In 1920s slang, it meant a cocaine addict. But it also came to mean something stranger: the kind of man who can’t resist pilfering panties off washing lines in the dead of night. According to SXSW Inc., snow droppers were the disturbed cousins of kleptomaniacs, their eyes set not on silverware, but on lingerie.

So when Phil — or whatever his real name is — was caught in the act, it must have been a jaw-dropper. Especially for him, once his night profile wound up printed in the daily rag under “person of interest.” Not only did Phil’s jaw drop, but his ego did too. Truth be told, quite a bit about Phil was starting to sag.

But let’s be fair: owls go on the prowl for mice, coyotes for chickens, wolves for anything that bleeds. And Phil? Phil prowls for panties. It’s his nature, apparently. The problem is, no one — not even Freud in his slippered prime — has managed to explain why. This is where Dr. Phil could step in, with that Texan twang and trademark exasperation: “Now, Phil, tell America why you thought raiding the undies drawer was a good life choice?”

Theories abound. Some say it’s a power thing, others a fetish. A criminologist might mutter something about deviance studies, while the rest of us just shake our heads and hope our laundry is out of reach. Whatever the reason, Phil’s little caper wasn’t so clandestine after all. Thanks to technology, the thrill of his midnight whiff is now the public’s morning coffee-spit headline.

And therein lies the comedy. What was once an embarrassing neighborhood secret is now a morality play for mass consumption. A “snow dropper” has been dragged blinking into the light, his shame doubled by the very word itself — archaic, silly, faintly ridiculous.

So here we are: the 21st century, with cameras sharper than ever, and yet we are still chasing shadows of 1920s slang. The ghost who stalks in the night has been unmasked, and his name might be Phil, the dill. If so, Dr. Phil has a new case study. And if not, well — whatever his name, the verdict is the same: there are better ways to get a thrill.

Snow dropping? That’s a habit best left in the Roaring Twenties, alongside bathtub gin and jazz-age slang.

Readers Of This Blog Reside In 115 Countries. 🌍 Where Are You Reading From?

 🌍 Where Are You Reading From?

We’ve had visitors from 115 countries around the world—some from the bustling cities of Asia, others from the quiet coastlines of the Caribbean. Your country might already be on the list… but if it’s not, we’d love to hear from you!

Is your country mentioned above?
If not, or if you’d simply like to say hello, drop a comment below and let us know where you're reading from. Let’s celebrate the global reach of truth, insight, and community—one country at a time.

🌐✍️ Add your nation to the conversation!

Nth America Canada USA Ctrl America Costa Rica El Salvador Guatemala Honduras Mexico Panama Sth America Argentina Bolivia Brazil Chile Colombia Ecuador Guyana Paraguay Peru Uruguay Venezuela Caribbean Aruba Dominica Dominican Republic Grenada Jamaica Puerto Rico Trinidad & Tobago

Africa Algeria Angola Botswana Congo - Brazzaville Côte d’Ivoire Egypt Gabon Kenya Morocco Nigeria Senegal Seychelles South Africa Togo Tunisia Zimbabwe

Europe Austria Belarus Bulgaria Czechia Estonia Finland France Greece Hungary Iceland Ireland Italy Germany Lithuania Luxembourg Malta Moldova Netherlands Poland Portugal Romania Russia Slovakia Spain Sweden Switzerland Ukraine United Kingdom

Balkans Albania Azerbaijan Armenia Bosnia & Herzegovina Croatia Cyprus Georgia Kosovo North Macedonia Middle East Bahrain Iran Iraq Israel Kuwait Lebanon Jordan Oman Palestine Qatar Saudi Arabia Syria Türkiye United Arab Emirates

Central Asia Bangladesh India Kazakhstan Kyrgyzstan Nepal Pakistan Turkmenistan Uzbekistan East Asia Japan China Hong Kong South Korea Mongolia South East Asia Brunei Cambodia Indonesia Laos Philippines Singapore Vietnam Oceania Australia